\begin{table}[H]
     \caption{Heterogeneity: Risk Preferences and Support}
     \label{tab:riskpref}  
     \begin{center}
     \begin{adjustbox}{max width=1\textwidth}
     \begin{tabular}{l*{9}{c}}
     \toprule %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
     & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Minimum Wage}	  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Corporate Tax}  & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Trans-Pacific Partnership} \\
     &  All & Expert &  Partisan & All &  Expert & Partisan & All &  Expert & Partisan \\
     \midrule %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 
Prediction center  &  -0.02 $^{*}$  &  -0.02   &  -0.02   &  0.05 $^{***}$  &  0.06 $^{***}$  &  0.04 $^{*}$  &  0.10 $^{***}$  &  0.08 $^{***}$  &  0.13 $^{***}$  \\ 
  & (0.01) & (0.02) & (0.02) & (0.01) & (0.02) & (0.02) & (0.01) & (0.01) & (0.01) \\[.25cm] 
 Prediction spread  &  -0.08   &  0.07   &  -0.23   &  0.04   &  -0.12   &  0.20   &  0.07   &  0.03   &  0.10   \\ 
  & (0.09) & (0.13) & (0.14) & (0.09) & (0.13) & (0.13) & (0.08) & (0.11) & (0.12) \\[.25cm] 
 Risk seeking  &  0.07 $^{***}$  &  0.09 $^{***}$  &  0.05 $^{*}$  &  0.09 $^{***}$  &  0.05   &  0.12 $^{***}$  &  0.09 $^{***}$  &  0.08 $^{***}$  &  0.10 $^{***}$  \\ 
  & (0.02) & (0.02) & (0.02) & (0.02) & (0.03) & (0.02) & (0.02) & (0.02) & (0.03) \\[.25cm] 
 Age  &  0.00 $^{*}$  &  0.00   &  0.00   &  0.00   &  0.00   &  0.00   &  -0.00   &  -0.00   &  -0.00   \\ 
  & (0.00) & (0.00) & (0.00) & (0.00) & (0.00) & (0.00) & (0.00) & (0.00) & (0.00) \\[.25cm] 
 Female  &  0.36 $^{***}$  &  0.40 $^{***}$  &  0.32 $^{***}$  &  -0.33 $^{***}$  &  -0.37 $^{***}$  &  -0.29 $^{***}$  &  0.10 $^{*}$  &  0.15 $^{*}$  &  0.04   \\ 
  & (0.05) & (0.08) & (0.08) & (0.05) & (0.08) & (0.08) & (0.04) & (0.06) & (0.06) \\[.25cm] 
 College degree  &  -0.01   &  -0.05   &  0.03   &  -0.25 $^{***}$  &  -0.19 $^{*}$  &  -0.31 $^{***}$  &  0.17 $^{***}$  &  0.19 $^{**}$  &  0.15 $^{*}$  \\ 
  & (0.06) & (0.08) & (0.08) & (0.06) & (0.08) & (0.08) & (0.05) & (0.07) & (0.07) \\[.25cm] 
 No high school  &  0.06   &  0.04   &  0.06   &  -0.05   &  -0.04   &  -0.06   &  -0.09   &  0.04   &  -0.21   \\ 
  & (0.11) & (0.17) & (0.16) & (0.11) & (0.16) & (0.14) & (0.10) & (0.14) & (0.14) \\[.25cm] 
 Inc $\leq$ 50K  &  0.28 $^{***}$  &  0.22 $^{*}$  &  0.34 $^{***}$  &  -0.12   &  -0.07   &  -0.17 $^{*}$  &  0.07   &  0.17 $^{*}$  &  -0.02   \\ 
  & (0.06) & (0.09) & (0.09) & (0.06) & (0.09) & (0.09) & (0.05) & (0.07) & (0.07) \\[.25cm] 
 Inc 100K150K  &  -0.12   &  -0.11   &  -0.13   &  0.04   &  0.14   &  -0.07   &  -0.04   &  -0.08   &  -0.01   \\ 
  & (0.08) & (0.12) & (0.12) & (0.08) & (0.11) & (0.12) & (0.07) & (0.09) & (0.09) \\[.25cm] 
 Inc $\geq$ 150K  &  -0.21   &  -0.07   &  -0.34 $^{*}$  &  0.32 $^{**}$  &  0.26   &  0.39 $^{*}$  &  0.23 $^{**}$  &  0.26 $^{*}$  &  0.19   \\ 
  & (0.11) & (0.15) & (0.15) & (0.11) & (0.15) & (0.16) & (0.09) & (0.12) & (0.13) \\[.25cm] 
 Spread $\times$ risk seeking  &  0.01   &  -0.01   &  0.03   &  -0.00   &  0.02   &  -0.02   &  -0.00   &  0.01   &  -0.02   \\ 
  & (0.01) & (0.02) & (0.02) & (0.01) & (0.02) & (0.02) & (0.01) & (0.02) & (0.02) \\[.25cm] 
 \midrule Observations &  5418  &  2696  &  2722  &  5424  &  2696  &  2728  &  5421  &  2696  &  2725  \\ 
 \bottomrule %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    \end{tabular}
    \end{adjustbox}
    \caption*{\footnotesize{\textbf{Note:} All models are estimated using least squares with robust standard errors. The first column per reform includes both the expert treatment and the partisan treatment, while the second and third column subsets the sample only to expert and partisan treatments, respectively. Risk seeking is measured on a 0-10 scale, where higher values indicate higher levels of risk seeking. Support is measured on a seven-point Likert scale, where higher values imply higher support for the policy. \\\hspace{\textwidth}
    $^* p <0.05, ^{**} p<0.01, ^{***} p<0.001$}}
    \end{center}
    \end{table}